By Dr. Paul G. Varnas & WholeHealthAmerica.com (The Better Health News, May, 2010; Volume 7, Issue 5)
treatments for ear infections: antibiotics and tympanostomy ("ear tubes" have
been brought into question. According to
(October 15, 1998:30), doctors in the
In this country, some physicians believe that antibiotics are overused. An article appearing in Family Practice News (June 15, 1996:43) blame the overuse of antibiotics on otitis media for the increase in drug-resistant strains of bacteria. The article notes that resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae have increased from 6% to 20% between 1992 and 1995. In 1994 otitis media was responsible for 29.6 visits to the doctor and 85% of the patients received prescription antibiotics.
The Dutch may be onto something with their use of decongestants. Allergies have been implicated in many cases of otitis media. Research appearing in Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery (Mau-June 1981;89:427-431) found that in 119 patients with a history of otitis media in the previous six months, and fluid present in the ear, 93.3% had allergies that were verified by positive RAST tests. The one-year success rate for the patients tested and treated for allergy was 91.6%. This success rate was much better than the 52.2% success rate enjoyed by a group of patients treated surgically. Other research appearing in Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery (1996;114:531-544) found that in a sampling of 103 patients with either otitis media, fluid effusion or both, 89% had allergy symptoms.
Patients with otitis media have responded to natural therapy. A study appearing in the Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology (July 2002;111(7 Part 1):642-652) looked at supplementation in 44 children with low levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA-found in fish oil), Vitamin A and selenium. Seven children were given cod liver oil (containing EPA and vitamin A) and a selenium supplement. Five of the children did not have any ear infections while being supplemented and overall the supplemented group had 12% fewer days where they require antibiotics for otitis media.
The use of "ear tubes" has long been questioned in Family Practice News (December 15.31, 1990;20(24):1,30). The article points out that the tubes can lead to hearing loss. There are studies that have subjects who have looked at subjects who have had a tube placed in one ear and not the other. The benefits of the tube last about six months or less. One study looked at 98 children who had one tube placed in a single ear. In a five year follow-up, it was found that there was a 21% higher incidence of deafness in the treated ear.